Many developing countries require aid from international organizations to grow. Many people think that this aid should be financial, while others believe practical aid and advice are useful. Discuss both views, and give your own opinion.
IELTS WRITING TASK-2
A host of evolving economies around the world desperately need the support of global associations. A big slice of society opines that assistance ought to be tied to funds, whereas other segment is the advocate for the fruitfulness of pragmatism and exhortations. I am an exponent of both perspectives since they are equally weighed. Therefore, these points will be addressed in the subsequent paragraphs.
With regard to the promotion of monetary and material aid, it appears that these are imperative for the expansion of every flourishing nation that is under the influence of indigence. To crash their circle of poverty not only massive budget is required, but also essential resources which can be introduced merely by some international organizations like the World Bank, IMF or WTO in the wake of fulfilling fundamental needs like food , clothing, shelter and education. This aid from foreign reserves would be a panacea to meddle and undermine the poverty regime. Beyond this, with the desired support of international organizations, nations can invest in accelerating a healthy and vast labour force. It can be easily done by establishing quality healthcare organizations, earmarking foreign funds to communicable diseases and bioterrorism outbreaks, as well as for the mental well-being of citizens. It would automatically limit the mortality rate and multiply the productive hands. For instance, nations with underdeveloped health care facilities, where the population is sparse or overwhelming, remain highly vulnerable to severe ailments. At that time, it is the sole responsibility of agencies such as the WHO to respond to individual needs. This situation prevails enormously in Nigeria, where every passing year an extensive population falls victim of poor medical services. Consequently, it is not one of the rapidly thriving economies.
On the other hand, proponents of ideational and intellectual assistance contend that this sort of furnishings sensitizes advancing countries about rudimentary principles of growth. They learn about innovative notions and get encouraged to implement those in their own homeland, by their own. They cease to depend on others and gain appreciable independence just with their own resources. For instance, WIPO, a global social welfare association, is working on the development agenda. Apart from providing technical assistance, it considerately works upon human capacity building programs by the medium of its academy and tailor-made workshops to build skills and amplify productivity in the least progressed markets. It pushes the intellectual property of the nation that nurtures the roots so that the fruits could be borne rather than borrowing or buying. What is more, ideational assistance illuminates the vision and shows right direction in which money should be invested to spur growth. As some nations have funds, however, they lack wisdom concerning right spheres which can contribute to generate maximum revenue. For example, nations like Pakistan strictly need to consider this where is just the right of privileged, neither of the downtrodden, nor of the females. Such economies are having difficulty strengthening their roots. Hence, when the mentality is not progressive, how can the nation be.
This image has been downloaded from fb.
To recapitulate, it is lucid that whether a nation should be granted tangible assets to thrive or its economy needs to be propelled by intangible means, it all depends on the situation of the regime. Therefore, I believe that these two sorts of aid are indispensable to the growth of blooming markets as both are interdependent.
- Approximately 320 words
- JASMEET KAUR
Comments
Post a Comment